Skip to main content

Claude Code Prompt for Safe Framework and Version Migrations

Migrate frameworks, language versions, or libraries safely with Claude Code: impact analysis, risk-grouped steps, per-change verification, and a rollback plan.

Fill in the placeholders

Edit the values, then copy your finished prompt.

Your Prompt
prompt.txt

                                

What this prompt does

This turns an upgrade you've been avoiding into an ordered, verifiable plan. You give Claude Code the move you want — [project_type] from [current_version] to [target_version] — plus the context that actually changes the risk profile: project [project_size], key [dependencies], your [test_coverage], and any [known_breaking_changes]. It runs an impact analysis across the codebase, audits dependency compatibility, then produces migration steps grouped into safe (mechanical find-and-replace), medium-risk (logic with a clear path), and high-risk (behavioral changes needing real testing).

It works because it refuses to treat a migration as one big diff. Every change comes back with the files affected, before/after code, why it changed, and how to verify it — so you're reviewing decisions, not guessing. The plan also covers the parts people skip and then get burned by: deprecation cleanup, config-file updates, test changes, and a rollback procedure.

The load-bearing instruction is the last line: apply changes incrementally, leave the project working after each step, run tests between steps. That single constraint is what keeps you from a half-migrated codebase you can't bisect.

When to use it

  • Stepping a framework up a major version (Laravel 10→11, Symfony, Rails, Django) where deprecations and config moved.
  • A language runtime bump — PHP 8.1→8.3, Node 18→22 — where syntax and stdlib behavior shift under you.
  • Swapping a library for a maintained replacement (Guzzle for an HTTP client, Moment for Day.js, a deprecated SDK).
  • Inheriting a legacy or low-coverage codebase where you need the risk grouping before touching anything.
  • Planning the migration before you start, so you can size the work and sequence it across PRs.

Example output

## Impact Analysis — Laravel 10 → 11 (medium app, 58% coverage)
Affected patterns found: 23 files
- Http/Kernel.php middleware registration (moved to bootstrap/app.php)
- 4 config files with renamed keys
- 9 deprecated Str:: helper calls

## Migration Steps
### Safe (automated)
1. Replace `$this->faker` → `fake()` — 6 test files
   Verify: php artisan test --testsuite=Unit

### Medium-risk
2. Migrate Kernel.php → bootstrap/app.php
   File: app/Http/Kernel.php → bootstrap/app.php
   Why: L11 removed the HTTP kernel; middleware now registered fluently
   Verify: php artisan route:list renders; auth middleware still applies

### High-risk
3. Carbon 3 upgrade: diffIn* now returns floats and can be negative
   Why: direction-aware, fractional results break any code comparing diffs as ints
   Verify: write a test pinning each diffIn* call site, then run it

## Rollback Plan
git revert per step; restore config/*.php from the pre-migration tag.

Pro tips

  • Be honest in [test_coverage]. Low coverage doesn't disqualify you — it tells the model to lean on manual verification steps and characterization tests instead of trusting a green suite that doesn't exist.
  • Front-load [known_breaking_changes] with the upgrade guide's headline items. It stops Claude rediscovering documented breaks and frees its attention for the breaks your code introduces.
  • Run it once read-only for the plan, commit that plan, then execute step by step. Pair it with my "Dependency Audit & Cleanup" prompt first so you migrate a clean dependency tree, not a tangled one.
  • Treat each risk tier as its own PR. Safe changes merge same-day; high-risk gets its own review. The grouping is the natural seam for splitting the work.
  • Tag your repo before step one. The rollback plan assumes a clean point to revert to — give it one.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this prompt actually run the migration, or just plan it?
Both, depending on how you drive it. The template asks for a full plan first — impact analysis, dependency audit, risk-grouped steps — and instructs Claude Code to apply changes incrementally, leaving the project working and running tests after each step. I recommend generating and committing the plan first, then letting it execute one step at a time so you can review each diff.
What if my test coverage is low or there are no tests?
Still works, and it's honestly where it earns its keep. Put your real number in [test_coverage]. The model uses it to calibrate: with weak coverage it shifts more changes into the high-risk tier and gives you manual verification steps and suggested characterization tests, rather than assuming a passing suite proves the migration is safe.
Can I use it for a library swap, not a version bump?
Yes. Set [current_version] and [target_version] to the two libraries (for example, Moment to Day.js, or one HTTP client to another). The impact analysis scans for every call site of the old library, and the before/after section shows the equivalent API in the replacement. The risk grouping still applies — identical-signature swaps land in safe, behavioral differences in high-risk.
Engr Mejba Ahmed

Need this built for real?

Engr Mejba Ahmed

AI Developer · Software Engineer

I'm Mejba — I design and ship production AI systems, automations, and full-stack apps. If you want this turned into a working solution for your team, let's talk.

More in Claude Code Prompts

Engr Mejba Ahmed

Engr Mejba Ahmed

Claude Code Expert · Online

👋

Hey there!

Quick Actions

WhatsApp Instant reply

Chat on WhatsApp

+880 1723 741224 · Instant reply

Popular Questions

Engr Mejba Ahmed is connected
Engr Mejba Ahmed is typing...
Engr Mejba Ahmed avatar

✉ Want me to follow up? Drop your email

Engr Mejba Ahmed avatar

📞 Connect Directly

Choose how you'd like to reach me

WhatsApp

+880 1723 741224

Email

[email protected]

✓ Details sent! I'll get back to you shortly.

Powered by OpenAI

335+

Blog Posts

25

AI Courses

63

Projects

Services & Expertise

Pricing & Process

Learning & Resources

Connect & Support