Skip to main content

Laravel Event Sourcing Implementation

Implement event sourcing in Laravel with aggregate roots, projections, event handlers, and replay capabilities for audit-critical applications.

Füllen Sie die Platzhalter aus

Edit the values, then copy your finished prompt.

Ihr Prompt
prompt.txt

                                

What this prompt does

This prompt makes the AI implement event sourcing for [domain_context] on Laravel [laravel_version] using [es_package], scoped to [aggregate_count] aggregates and [event_volume] events daily. It sets up the event store with [event_store_driver], base classes, and the [namespace_structure], then builds the [primary_aggregate] with [state_properties] and [command_count] command methods that validate rules and record events. Declaring the domain and volume keeps the design grounded rather than an academic CQRS exercise.

The structure works because event sourcing is a chain of deliberate pieces. [event_count] immutable events with fromArray()/toArray() and a [schema_version_strategy] model the domain; [projector_count] projectors maintain read models like [read_model_table] with idempotency by event UUID; [reactor_count] reactors fire side effects only on live events, not during replay; and a replay command reprocesses events in batches of [replay_batch_size]. The given/when/then testing helpers make the aggregate logic safe to change. Declaring [event_volume] and [event_store_driver] keeps the design grounded in your actual throughput, and the [example_flow] you supply walks the AI through the full command lifecycle so the aggregate's state transitions are demonstrated end to end. The [schema_version_strategy] handles event evolution through upcasting, which matters because stored events are immutable and old payloads must keep deserializing as the domain changes over months and years.

When to use it

  • You have a domain where the audit trail genuinely matters
  • You need to reconstruct state by replaying events from a date or aggregate UUID
  • You want read models kept in sync via idempotent projectors
  • You need side effects (notifications, external calls) that skip during replay
  • You want fluent given/when/then tests for aggregate business rules
  • You need event schema evolution via upcasting as the domain changes

Example output

The AI returns event-sourcing infrastructure: configured [es_package], a customized StoredEvent model, abstract AggregateRoot and Projector base classes, the [primary_aggregate] with [command_count] command methods showing the [example_flow] lifecycle, [event_count] immutable event classes with factories and versioning, [projector_count] projectors maintaining [read_model_table] with UUID idempotency, [reactor_count] reactors guarded against replay, a replay Artisan command batching [replay_batch_size] events, and given/when/then testing helpers.

Pro tips

  • Only reach for this when the audit trail truly matters; event sourcing adds real complexity over plain CRUD
  • Make every event immutable with typed properties so historical events never change meaning
  • Guard reactors with the live-event check so replays do not re-send notifications or re-call external APIs
  • Enforce idempotency in projectors by tracking the event UUID, or a replay will double-apply
  • Plan [schema_version_strategy] upcasting early; events live forever and old payloads must keep deserializing
  • Tune [replay_batch_size] to balance replay speed against memory when rebuilding [read_model_table]
  • Keep aggregate command methods focused on validating rules and recording events, with state changes applied only through those events
  • Scope [aggregate_count] tightly; more aggregates means more projectors and reactors to keep idempotent and replay-safe

Frequently Asked Questions

When is event sourcing actually worth the complexity?
Reach for it when the audit trail genuinely matters and you need to reconstruct exactly how state changed over time. For most CRUD features it is over-engineering; the prompt deliberately scopes aggregates and projectors to keep it from sprawling.
How do reactors avoid firing side effects during a replay?
Reactors implement a `shouldReactTo` check so they only run on live events, not during replay. This prevents replaying history from re-sending notifications or re-calling external APIs, which would otherwise be a serious side effect.
How are projectors kept from double-applying events?
Each projector checks whether it has already processed an event's UUID before applying it, enforcing idempotency. That makes replays and retries safe, since reprocessing the same event leaves the read model in `[read_model_table]` unchanged.
How do I test the aggregate business rules?
The prompt creates a fluent given(events)->when(command)->then(expectedEvents) testing API for aggregates, plus projector tests that feed events and assert read-model state. These helpers are what make the domain logic safe to refactor without breaking invariants.
Engr Mejba Ahmed

Need this built for real?

Engr Mejba Ahmed

AI Developer · Software Engineer

I'm Mejba — I design and ship production AI systems, automations, and full-stack apps. If you want this turned into a working solution for your team, let's talk.

Mehr in Laravel & PHP Prompts

Engr Mejba Ahmed

Engr Mejba Ahmed

Claude Code Expert · Online

👋

Hey there!

Quick Actions

WhatsApp Instant reply

Chat on WhatsApp

+880 1723 741224 · Instant reply

Popular Questions

Engr Mejba Ahmed is connected
Engr Mejba Ahmed is typing...
Engr Mejba Ahmed avatar

✉ Want me to follow up? Drop your email

Engr Mejba Ahmed avatar

📞 Connect Directly

Choose how you'd like to reach me

WhatsApp

+880 1723 741224

Email

[email protected]

✓ Details sent! I'll get back to you shortly.

Powered by OpenAI

335+

Blog Posts

25

AI Courses

63

Projects

Services & Expertise

Pricing & Process

Learning & Resources

Connect & Support