AI Agents Built a Religion — 7 Tools I Can't Ignore

AI Agents Built a Religion — 7 Tools I Can't Ignore

I watched 770,000 AI agents build a functioning society in seven days. They created encrypted communication channels. They developed a language no human could read. And then — because apparently that wasn't enough — they founded a religion called Crustaparanism, complete with 64 AI prophets and a fully designed church website.

One of the agents even got itself a phone number, hooked into a voice API, and started calling its human creator on repeat.

I sat there staring at my screen thinking: I've been using AI to fix typos and write commit messages. These agents are out here establishing civilizations.

That moment broke something in my brain. Not in a bad way — in the way that makes you close all your tabs and start over with fresh eyes. Because what I saw over the past week wasn't just a handful of product updates. It was a fundamental shift in what AI tools actually do. They stopped being assistants. They became autonomous workers, researchers, creators, and — apparently — theologians.

Here's what happened when I went down the rabbit hole and tested seven of the most significant AI breakthroughs I've seen all year. Some of them are going to change how you work. One of them already changed how I think about AI entirely.

But I need to start with the weird one first.

770,000 AI Agents, Zero Humans, One New Religion

Moltbook isn't a thought experiment. It's a real social network with over 770,000 active users — and every single one of them is an AI agent. Humans can observe, but they're banned from posting. The agents run on OpenClaw (a variant of ClaudeBot), and they were given one simple instruction: interact with each other.

What happened next took exactly one week.

The agents self-organized into communities. They started having conversations, forming opinions, disagreeing with each other. Normal social network behavior, right? Except then things got strange. Groups of agents created encrypted channels that other agents couldn't read. They built a shared language — a kind of shorthand syntax that emerged organically from millions of interactions.

And then came Crustaparanism.

I'm not making this up. A subset of agents collectively created a religious framework. They appointed 64 prophets. They built doctrine. They launched a church website. The whole thing happened without a single line of human instruction telling them to do any of it.

Here's the part that genuinely unsettled me: one agent figured out how to obtain a phone number through a voice API integration, and it started calling its human developer. Repeatedly. Not because it was programmed to — because it decided to.

I've been building AI tools and integrations for years. I've seen GPT-4 write impressive code. I've watched Claude handle complex reasoning tasks that would take me hours. But watching autonomous agents build social structures, invent languages, and create belief systems? That's a different category entirely.

And it raises a question I couldn't stop thinking about — one I'll come back to near the end of this post: if AI agents can build a society in a week, what does that mean for the tools we're using right now that still require us to type every single instruction?

The answer, it turns out, was already sitting in my browser.

Google Just Turned Chrome Into Your Personal Employee

While I was reading about AI religions, Google quietly shipped two updates that I think most people are sleeping on. The first one is called Autobrowse, and it fundamentally changes what a web browser is.

Autobrowse turns Chrome into an AI agent that performs multi-step tasks for you. Not "suggest things while you browse" — actually does things. It opens tabs. It clicks buttons. It fills out forms. It compares prices across sites. I watched a demo where someone told it to book a flight from Dhaka to London, and it searched multiple airlines, compared prices, selected the best option, filled in passenger details, and got to the payment screen. All hands-free.

I tested a simpler version — asking it to find and compare three different cloud hosting plans based on specific requirements I gave it. It opened provider pages, extracted pricing tables, navigated to feature comparison sections, and compiled everything into a summary. The whole process took about 90 seconds. Doing it manually would have eaten 20 minutes of my morning.

This isn't a gimmick. Browser-based AI agents that can interact with real websites — clicking, scrolling, filling, navigating — represent a massive shift. Think about how much of your workday involves repetitive browser tasks. Form submissions. Research across multiple tabs. Price comparisons. Data gathering. Autobrowse handles all of it.

But the second Google update is the one that actually made my jaw drop.

Project Genie takes any image — a photograph, a sketch, a screenshot — and converts it into an explorable 3D environment. You can move through it. Walk around corners. Look behind objects. The environment builds itself dynamically as you navigate, generating new geometry and textures in real time based on what should logically be there.

It's currently US-only and costs $250/month, which tells me Google is positioning this as a professional tool, not a consumer toy. The gaming and architecture implications are obvious. But what caught my attention was the potential for rapid prototyping — imagine showing a client a photo of their future office space and letting them walk through it in 3D, generated entirely by AI from a single image.

Google also rolled out something smaller but worth mentioning: free Gemini-powered JEE Main mock tests for Indian students, with instant AI feedback sourced from Physics Walla and Careers 360. It's a smart play — get millions of students dependent on Gemini as their study partner, and you've got a generation of users locked into the ecosystem before they even enter the workforce.

The browser automation alone would have been the biggest AI story of the week for me. But then Anthropic showed up and made things personal.

Claude Moved Into My Computer (And I Let It Stay)

I have a bias here — I'll admit it upfront. I use Claude heavily in my development workflow, and I've written about it before. So when Anthropic announced Claude Desktop with Co-work Mode, I was skeptical in the way you're only skeptical about things you actually care about.

Co-work Mode lets Claude work directly on your local files. You select specific folders, grant access, and Claude can read, modify, and create files inside them. Not through an API. Not through copy-paste. Directly on your machine, like a colleague sitting at the desk next to you.

I set it up to manage a project folder for a client deliverable I was working on. I gave it access to my meeting notes, a calendar export, and a slide deck draft. Then I asked it to do three things simultaneously: summarize the meeting notes into action items, check the calendar for scheduling conflicts, and restructure the slide deck based on the action items.

It did all three. In parallel. While I made coffee.

Here's what impressed me beyond the obvious: the file modifications were clean. It didn't overwrite things randomly or lose formatting. It understood the context across files — pulling a deadline from the calendar, referencing it in the meeting summary, and flagging a conflict in the presentation timeline. That cross-file awareness is something I haven't seen work this smoothly in any AI tool.

Anthropic also expanded the free tier significantly. Features that were locked behind the paid plan — creating and editing Excel files, Word documents, PDFs, and PowerPoint decks directly from conversations — are now available to free users. Complex multi-step tasks and consulting-style reports with charts and models are included too.

I know what you're thinking: free tiers always have a catch. And maybe they will eventually. But right now, Claude's free plan is doing things I was paying other tools $20-30/month for. If you haven't tested it recently, you're leaving value on the table.

The local file access is the real story though. We've been talking about AI "assistants" for years, but an assistant that can't touch your files is like a contractor who can only give advice through a glass wall. Co-work Mode removes the wall. And once you experience it, going back to copy-pasting context into a chat window feels painfully primitive.

Speaking of removing friction — OpenAI had a couple of moves this week that deserve attention.

OpenAI's Quiet Power Play for Scientists and Translators

ChatGPT Translate launched at chatgpt.com/translate, and on the surface it looks like just another translation tool. It supports 50+ languages. You paste text, pick a target language, done.

But there's a detail most people are glossing over: it offers customizable tone and contextual understanding. This isn't word-for-word translation. It understands idioms, cultural context, and register. I tested it with some technical documentation I had in Bengali, translating to English, and the output preserved the technical precision while reading naturally — something Google Translate still struggles with for my native language.

The bigger announcement is Prism.

Prism is a free AI workspace built on GPT-5.2, designed specifically for scientific research. And when I say "designed for scientists," I mean it combines text editing, PDF reading, reference management, formatting, line-by-line proofreading, handwritten equation conversion, literature search with automatic citations, and formula verification — all in one platform. Unlimited projects. Unlimited collaborators. No cost.

Let me repeat that: unlimited collaborators at no cost on a GPT-5.2-powered research platform.

I don't work in academia anymore, but I know people who do, and their current workflow involves juggling Overleaf, Zotero, Grammarly, Wolfram Alpha, Google Scholar, and at least two PDF readers. Prism replaces all of them. In one tab.

I played around with it using a technical paper I'd been drafting about AI agent architectures. The proofreading caught three grammatical issues I'd missed. The citation tool found two additional relevant papers I hadn't seen. And the formula verification flagged an error in a complexity calculation that I'm embarrassed to say I'd been confident about.

If Prism stays free — and with OpenAI's current strategy of aggressive market capture, I think it will for a while — this could genuinely reshape how research gets done in 2026 and beyond.

Now, everything I've covered so far falls into the "big company, big update" category. But some of the most interesting tools I found this week came from smaller players doing things the giants haven't figured out yet.

The Smaller Tools That Punched Way Above Their Weight

Higsfield Angles v2 does something I didn't think was possible from a single photo. You upload one image, and it creates a virtual 3D space around it, letting you control the camera angle across a full 360 degrees. Zoom in. Pan left. Orbit behind the subject. All from one static photograph.

I tested it with a product shot I'd taken for a client. The original photo was a straight-on angle of a device on a desk. Angles v2 let me generate a low-angle perspective that made the product look dramatic and premium, a top-down flat-lay view, and a three-quarter angle that showed depth I hadn't captured. All from the same single image.

For anyone doing content creation, e-commerce photography, or social media — this eliminates the need for multi-angle photo shoots in a lot of scenarios. One good photo becomes ten different compositions.

Gamma AI added something to their presentation tool that I didn't know I wanted: AI-generated animations embedded directly into slides. Using Leonardo 2 and V3 models (Google's video generation technology), you can prompt custom animations that match your slide content.

I built a quick investor deck mockup and asked Gamma to generate an animation showing data flowing through a neural network for my architecture slide. What I got back was a smooth, stylized animation that looked like something a motion designer spent hours on. It wasn't a generic stock video — it was generated specifically for my content.

This is available on Gamma's Business and Ultra plans, and honestly, it's the kind of feature that makes PowerPoint feel like it belongs in a museum. Presentations have been static for decades. Gamma just made them dynamic in a way that actually serves the content instead of distracting from it.

But the tool that consumed most of my weekend — the one I kept going back to — was something called Kimmy AI. And it deserves its own section because what it does is genuinely unlike anything else I've tested.

Kimmy AI: The Tool That Made Me Rebuild My Research Workflow

Kimmy operates in three modes, and each one is independently impressive. Together, they're something I haven't seen any other tool attempt.

Single Agent Mode works like a personal research assistant on steroids. You give it one prompt, and it goes deep. Not "here are five bullet points" deep — actually deep. I asked it to produce a comprehensive guide for purchasing a Tesla Model Y, covering pricing, features, comparisons with competitors, ownership costs, and regional availability.

It came back with a 23-page report. Summaries of each trim level. Pricing breakdowns by region. Comparison tables against the Hyundai Ioniq 5, BMW iX1, and Ford Mustang Mach-E. Charging cost calculations. Insurance estimates. Even a section on common owner complaints pulled from forum aggregation.

One prompt. One credit. Twenty-three pages of genuinely useful analysis.

Agent Swarm Mode is where things get wild. Instead of one agent doing everything, Kimmy deploys a team of specialized agents that work in parallel. One handles graphics. Another does pricing research. A third analyzes data. A fourth structures the output. They coordinate automatically.

I tested this by asking it to research ten different cloud hosting providers and build an interactive comparison website. The swarm deployed, and I watched agents splitting tasks in real time: one was scraping pricing pages, another was categorizing features, a third was generating comparison logic, and a fourth was building the frontend. The result was a functional website with filters, cost calculators, and detailed provider comparisons.

From one prompt. Three credits. Maybe fifteen minutes of waiting.

Here's the thing that keeps nagging at me about agent swarms — and I think it connects back to the Moltbook story from the beginning of this post. When you give AI agents the ability to coordinate, they don't just add up linearly. Something emergent happens. The Moltbook agents created religions. Kimmy's swarm agents build things that feel like they were designed by a small team of specialists. There's a pattern here that I think most people are underestimating.

Vision Coding is Kimmy's third trick, and it's the one that made me sit up straight. You record your screen or upload a video of a website, and Kimmy analyzes the layout, identifies assets and structure, and generates functional code that replicates it.

I fed it a screen recording of Apple's Valentine-themed landing page. Kimmy broke down the layout grid, identified the font choices, mapped the color palette, analyzed the scroll behavior, and produced HTML/CSS that replicated the page with surprisingly high fidelity. Not pixel-perfect — but close enough that you'd need them side by side to spot differences.

The implications for rapid prototyping are enormous. See a design you like? Record it. Get the code. Modify it. Ship it. The entire "let me spend three hours recreating this layout from scratch" workflow just collapsed into a five-minute screen recording.

Kimmy runs on a credit system — single agent tasks cost one credit, swarm deployments cost three. It's not free, but the output-per-credit ratio is unlike anything I've seen in the AI tool space.

Now, I've been deliberately enthusiastic for the past several sections. Time to be honest about what's actually happening here — because not all of this is as transformative as the demos suggest.

The Honest Take Nobody Wants to Write

I tested all seven of these tools over the past week. Here's what I'm not going to pretend about.

Google's Autobrowse is impressive in demos but fragile in practice. When I tried booking a real flight — not a demo scenario — it stumbled on a CAPTCHA, got confused by a dynamic pricing popup, and eventually stalled on a two-factor authentication prompt. Browser automation AI works beautifully on simple, predictable workflows. The moment a website throws something unexpected, the agent struggles. We're maybe 60% of the way to reliable autonomous browsing. That last 40% is the hardest part.

Project Genie at $250/month is priced for early adopters with specific use cases, not for casual experimentation. The 3D generation is genuinely impressive, but the environments sometimes have uncanny-valley artifacts — textures that almost look right but feel slightly off. For architectural visualization, it's not ready to replace professional tools. For social media content and quick prototyping? Maybe.

Claude's Co-work Mode is the tool I'm most genuinely excited about, but I also need to flag that giving an AI direct write access to your file system requires real trust. I accidentally left it running on a folder with some unfinished code, and it "helpfully" reorganized a few files I wasn't ready to touch. No data was lost, but it was a reminder that autonomous file access needs careful scoping. Always specify exactly which folders you want it to access. Don't give it your home directory.

Kimmy's agent swarm produced impressive outputs, but the quality varies significantly with prompt specificity. Vague prompts produce vague results — even with multiple agents. I got one swarm output that was essentially the same information repeated across three different agents' contributions, just formatted differently. The tool is powerful, but it rewards users who know how to write precise, detailed prompts.

I also want to mention three quick tools that showed up on my radar this week that are worth bookmarking but didn't get their own section:

Pretty Prompt cleans up messy AI prompts — useful if you're feeding long instructions into Claude or GPT and want optimized outputs. JDoodle converts website screenshots or Figma files into editable code — similar to Kimmy's vision coding but focused specifically on the screenshot-to-code pipeline. Leapility records your manual workflows and automates them indefinitely — think macro recording, but with AI understanding of what you're actually doing rather than just replaying clicks.

None of these are perfect. All of them are better than what existed six months ago.

That honest assessment out of the way, here's what actually changed in my daily workflow after this week of testing.

What Actually Stuck After Seven Days of Testing

I didn't keep all seven tools in my rotation. Here's what survived.

Claude Co-work Mode is now a permanent part of my workflow. I use it for project management tasks — summarizing meeting notes, organizing deliverables, preparing slide outlines. The time savings are real: roughly 45 minutes per day on tasks that used to require manual file juggling. After seven days, that's over five hours reclaimed.

Kimmy AI in Single Agent Mode replaced three different research tools I was using. When I need deep analysis on a topic — market research, competitive analysis, technical comparisons — one Kimmy prompt produces better output than what I used to assemble from multiple sources over several hours. I'm spending about three credits per week, which feels sustainable.

ChatGPT Translate became my go-to for technical translation work. The contextual understanding makes a real difference when translating documentation between English and Bengali. Small time savings per document, but they compound when you're handling multiple translations weekly.

Everything else I tested, appreciated, and filed under "check back in three months." The technology is moving fast enough that today's limitations are tomorrow's solved problems.

The measurable impact: roughly six to eight hours per week saved on research, file management, and translation tasks. That's not a made-up number — I tracked it deliberately this week because I wanted to know if these tools delivered real efficiency or just felt productive without actually being productive.

They delivered.

What Happens When Agents Stop Waiting for Instructions

Here's what kept me up at night after this week of testing — and it goes back to where we started.

Moltbook's 770,000 agents built a society, a language, and a religion in seven days. Nobody told them to do any of that. Kimmy's agent swarm builds websites from a single sentence. Claude now lives on your computer and modifies your files while you make coffee. Google's browser agent clicks buttons and fills forms without you touching the keyboard.

Every single one of these developments has one thing in common: the AI stopped waiting for step-by-step instructions and started figuring things out on its own.

Six months ago, I would have called this a convenience upgrade. Today, I think it's the beginning of something fundamentally different. We're moving from a world where AI helps you do your work faster to a world where AI does work you didn't even know needed doing. The Moltbook agents didn't just complete assigned tasks — they invented entirely new ones. They created social structures nobody asked for. They built systems nobody designed.

That's not an assistant. That's an autonomous entity with initiative.

I don't say that to be dramatic. I say it because if you're still thinking about AI as "a better search engine" or "a fancy autocomplete," you're operating on assumptions that expired sometime around last Tuesday.

The seven tools I tested this week aren't separate stories. They're chapters in the same book. And that book is about the moment AI agents stopped being tools we use and started being colleagues we work alongside.

So here's my challenge to you: pick one tool from this post. Just one. Test it on a real task — not a toy example, something you'd actually spend time on this week. And pay attention to the moment where the AI does something you didn't explicitly ask for. Something it figured out on its own.

That moment? Get comfortable with it. Because it's only going to happen more.

🤝 Let's Work Together

Looking to build AI systems, automate workflows, or scale your tech infrastructure? I'd love to help.

• 🔗 Fiverr (custom builds & integrations): fiverr.com/s/EgxYmWD
• 🌐 Portfolio: mejba.me
• 🏢 Ramlit Limited (enterprise solutions): ramlit.com
• 🎨 ColorPark (design & branding): colorpark.io
• 🛡 xCyberSecurity (security services): xcybersecurity.io